The complement to sciences natural tendency to reductionism (see an examination of reductionism) is emergence.
An emergent property is one describing a
higher level of organization of matter, where the description is not
epistemologically reducible to lower-level concepts.![]()
A classic example would be that of an ecosystem. In order to understand organisms co-existing together we need this concept, and cannot reduce it out of our understandings. (Come to that, the concept multi-cellular organism is itself emergent - simply to describe an animal as a collection of cells living together is to miss a great many properties characteristic of the way those cells co-operate.)
Two notes of caution:
What actually happened in the history of
molecular biology was most interesting. A number of scientists, Crick included,
first began to consider questions of the chemistry of life because of a series
of lectures given by the physicist Erwin Schrödinger in Dublin in 1943, and
published as What is Life?
The remarkable success of the
investigations of such figures as Linus Pauling, Max Perutz, Francis Crick and
James D Watson gave momentum to this programme of redescribing biology in terms
of physics and chemistry, but has not effected a reduction of the one to
the other. Rather all sorts of emergent
properties have been recognised at the interface between biology and chemistry.
Francis Cricks aim to reduce all biology to chemistry and physics
has not been realised.
| Topic Index |
More: The Particular Case of Genetic Reductionism |
| Show Related Topics |
Email
link | Feedback | Contributed by: Dr.
Christopher Southgate
Source: God, Humanity and the
Cosmos (T&T Clark, 1999)